Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 500 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 500 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
