Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa Tanacom 750 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Daiwa Tanacom 750 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 20kg / 44,09lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
