Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €13.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/245
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
