Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €14.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX
