Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €15.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/315
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Aero 4000X
