Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
51.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight254g / 8.96oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €16.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/310
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin BRONZ?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
