Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight360g / 12oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €26.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 50X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 50X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
