Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
