Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin HORNET 60X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin HORNET
Spinning
44.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.63 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €27.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size60
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/440
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin HORNET 60X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin HORNET 60X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin HORNET?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X
