Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin INKS 6000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
