Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
