Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X
