Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX
