Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
