Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
