Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (230g / 8,11oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
