Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
