Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-HX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX
