Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 155g / 5,47oz and a ergonomics of 6.48 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX
