Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X
