Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Ocea Jigger
Multireels
90.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight791g / 27.9oz
Line retireve per crank117 centimeter / 46.06 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €509.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.8/494
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX and Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Ocea Jigger?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX
