Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ), 4000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10426-400
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €175.50
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Shimano Sahara FJ, 4000 XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SH4000XGFJ
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €71.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000 XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.58 out of 10) and the total score (8.97 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Sahara FJ?

There are not much differences between the two comparables