Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II
Multireels
85.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1/2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1025g / 36.16oz
Line retireve per crank118 centimeter / 46.46 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €295.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 30/550
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX and Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1/2.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X
