Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Spheros SW A

Seafishing

61.20 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability8 out of 10

Ergonomics5.44 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight675g / 23.81oz

Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €149.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size10000 PG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/300

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Spheros SW A?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques