Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 190g / 6,7oz and a ergonomics of 6.37 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
