Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)

Spinning

89.70 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.58 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €175.50
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000D-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power FE

Spinning

76.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.56 out of 10

Ergonomics6.28 out of 10

Gear ratio6.4:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight215g / 7.58oz

Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch

Ball bearings9+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €389.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000XGFE
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch and a weight of 215g / 7,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.