Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR
