Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Spinning
57.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag2.5 kg - 5.51 lbs
Weight315 g - 11.1oz
Line retireve per crank88 cm / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings4 Shielded Stainless Steel
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18-290 / 0,20-240 / 0,25-160 / 0,30-105 lb/yds: 6-200 / 8-140 / 10-120
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.58 out of 10) and weight (230g / 8,11oz). While Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X
