Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and durability (8.58 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX
