Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5115oz and a ergonomics of 6.52 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
