Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5.12oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €319.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 145g / 5,12oz and a ergonomics of 6.52 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
