Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X
