Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX
