Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight670g / 23.63oz
Line retireve per crank129 centimeter / 50.79 inch
Ball bearings13
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €895.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size18000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.52/310
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
