Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX
