Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
