Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
