Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
