Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X
