Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
