Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
