Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
