Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
