Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
