Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C5000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX
