Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
