Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a weight of 150g / 5,29oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33858 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
