Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
79.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX and Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX offers a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
