Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Delphin REDIX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Delphin REDIX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Delphin REDIX?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin REDIX
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX
