Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.43 out of 10 (80cm / 31.50 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X
Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX