Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.5 out of 10

Gear ratio4.9:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight150g / 5.29oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €635.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000D-P
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Mitchell MX2 Spinning

Spinning

3000x

63.90 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.14 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs

Weight258g / 9.1oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandMITCHELL
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €29.60
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.44 out of 10). While Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency