Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
