Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Catana FE
Spinning
48.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag8.5kg / 18,74lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €34.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Shimano Catana FE 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (150g / 5,29oz). While Shimano Catana FE 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Catana FE?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Catana FE 4000X
- 6.86 out of 10 (83 centimeter / 32.68 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX
Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX
Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X
Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX