Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Talica 20II CAM
Multireels
20ii Camx
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.64 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1 / 3.1:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight920g / 32.45oz
Line retireve per crank104cm / 56cm
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €499.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20II CAM
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX edges out Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6+1) and the line retrieve per crank (104cm / 56cm). Still, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 150g / 5,29oz and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Talica 20II CAM?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (104cm / 56cm), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
